본문으로 건너뛰기
← 글 목록
SCM·수익성soonsik ahn

재고를 쥐고 있는 동안 두 개의 시계가 돌아간다

Two clocks are ticking on your inventory.

보관 비용은 쌓이고, 유통기한이 가까워질수록 더 깎아 줘야 팔립니다. 지금 할인할지 한 달 더 기다릴지는 제품, 판매 채널, 계절에 따라 계산이 달라집니다.

LinkedIn 최초 발행 · 원문 영어
LinkedIn 원문·댓글 보기 ↗

위에는 한국어 요약을, 아래에는 영어 원문을 실었습니다.

Two clocks are ticking on your inventory.

Most companies only hear one.
Whilst inventory sits in a warehouse, two clocks tick simultaneously.
The cost clock: storage fees, tied-up capital, production capacity consumed. These accelerate over time.

The negotiation clock: when shelf life is comfortable, 10% off can persuade a channel partner. When expiry looms, 40% won't suffice. The channel holds all the leverage.
These two clocks move in opposite directions.
The longer you hold, the higher your costs. The longer you hold, the weaker your hand.
Is it cheaper to decide now, or later?

Inditex — Zara's parent — grasped this early, adjusting markdown timing in real time, mid-season. Widely credited as why their write-off rates are dramatically lower than competitors'.

Food is harsher. Fashion has outlet stores as a fallback. Food has a hard deadline: the expiry date. Once the curves cross, your options vanish.
Put the numbers on the same table: a 10% discount today reduces margin by a known amount. Waiting 30 days means costs accumulate, the required discount deepens, and channel acceptance falls.

When these figures sit side by side, no one needs to argue on instinct.
Simple concept. But in practice, you hit a wall.
New launches carry genuine demand uncertainty. Established products behave differently depending on lifecycle stage.

Let's be frank: products that become excess inventory are overwhelmingly the ones that never found their market. The forecast was wrong from the start. That isn't a markdown problem. It's a "why did we produce this much?" problem.

Seasonality matters. Ice products face a cliff once summer passes. Holiday gift sets are finished the day after the holiday. In-season versus out-of-season draws entirely different curves.

Channels matter. Online shows high price elasticity. Supermarkets impose listing conditions. Convenience stores enforce tight shelf-life rules. The same discount produces completely different responses.
Shelf life matters. Thirty days on a 12-month ambient product is comfortable. Thirty days on a 14-day fresh product is a crisis.

And these are not the only variables. The same SKU can approach write-off at one warehouse whilst out of stock at another. Imports with months-long lead times mean curves cross before any decision is possible. Temperature constraints, supplier return terms, warehouse contract changes — the real-world variables far exceed what textbooks list.
Product type × lifecycle × season × channel × remaining shelf life — plus location, procurement structure, storage constraints, and more.

Two curves, one table. Simple concept.
But every product, channel, season, and location draws a different curve.
A single formula for all of this? Impossible.

What's needed is not a universal equation — but a system that draws each curve individually and signals when a crossing point approaches.
Next post: what that system looks like.

#InventoryManagement #SandOP #FMCG #SCM #ProfitOptimization

diagram
← 글 목록LinkedIn에서 대화 이어가기 ↗

함께 읽을 글

SCM·수익성

No-touch Planning은 왜 다시 엑셀로 돌아갈까?

시스템에는 계획을 입력하지만 조건이 바뀌면 엑셀부터 엽니다. 예외 처리와 최종 판단이 여전히 밖에 남아 있다면, 시스템은 수작업을 대신한 것이 아니라 옮겨 놓은 셈입니다.

영어 원문 · 게시물본문 읽기 →